In the January 26, 2025 NFC Championship game, the Philadelphia Eagles defeated the Washington Commanders 55–23. The stat sheet reflects a dominant offensive performance by the Eagles, while turnovers and inconsistent execution limited the Commanders’ effectiveness.
Quick Summary Box
What |
Summary |
|---|---|
Final Score |
Eagles 55 – Commanders 23 |
Total Yards (Team) |
Eagles: 459 yards — Commanders: 350 yards |
Rushing Yards |
Eagles: 229 yards — Commanders: 99 yards |
Passing (Comp / Att) |
Eagles: 20/28 — Commanders: 30/49 |
Turnovers (Lost) |
Eagles: 0 — Commanders: 4 |
Who This Breakdown Helps |
Fans, analysts, bettors, fantasy players, content creators, scouts |
What Is the Washington Commanders vs Philadelphia Eagles Match Player Stats Report?
This is a fully detailed, data-rich breakdown covering every significant statistic from the game: offensive numbers (passing, rushing, receiving), defensive stats, turnovers, team metrics (yards, time of possession, conversions), and context-based insights — giving a clear, accurate picture of how the game unfolded and who made an impact.
Why This Match Matters (2024–2025 Season Context)
-
It was the NFC Championship Game, with Super Bowl implications.
-
Performance here influences team reputation, roster assessments, and playoff expectations.
-
Provides valuable data for fantasy football valuations, sports analysis, betting trends, and historical rivalry context.
Full Match Summary (Score, Timing & Momentum Swings)
The game saw explosive scoring from the Eagles early and consistent rushing dominance. Key momentum shifts occurred after turnovers and big runs, while the Commanders struggled to maintain drives and convert opportunities.
Player Stats Breakdown – Offense, Defense & Special Teams
Offensive Player Stats
Team Totals (Passing, Rushing, Receiving)
Defensive & Turnover Stats
Team Performance Comparison (Commanders vs Eagles)
Key Match Highlights & Big Moments
-
Eagles established early momentum with a dominant rushing attack.
-
Turnovers by the Commanders — including multiple fumbles and an interception — drastically shifted field position and scoring opportunity.
-
Eagles’ balanced offense (rush + pass) prevented Commanders from focusing on one dimension.
-
Commanders struggled with consistency — their rushing game was limited and passing was inefficient under pressure.
Pros & Cons (Team-by-Team Performance Review)
Philadelphia Eagles – Pros
-
Dominant rushing yards (229 yd) and high rushing attempts.
-
Efficient passing (20/28) with no turnovers.
-
Strong field position advantage thanks to turnovers issued by the Commanders.
-
Balanced offense allowed multiple scoring opportunities, dominating time-of-possession and yardage.
Cons
-
Minor penalty yardage (30 yards) that could have stalled some drives.
-
Reliance on run-heavy game plan could be risky against elite defensive fronts.
Washington Commanders – Pros
-
Managed some successful drives and 251 passing yards.
-
Showed moderate rushing capability (99 yards) with some plays attempting to challenge Eagles’ defense.
Cons
-
Critical turnovers (3 fumbles + 1 interception) destroyed comeback chances.
-
Passing was inefficient (30/49) and lacked explosive plays.
-
Rushing game limited; could not match Eagles’ effectiveness.
-
Penalties (47 yards) and lack of red-zone efficiency contributed to missed opportunities.
Advanced Analytics & Contextual Insights
-
Yards per Play: Eagles 7.0 vs Commanders 4.5 → shows explosive offense vs struggling offense.
-
Rush-to-pass balance: Eagles leaned on rushing (36 attempts vs 28 passes) which kept defenses off-balance.
-
Turnover differential: +4 advantage for Eagles — crucial in playoff-level games.
-
Possession time & total drives: Balanced, but Eagles used drives efficiently to convert into points.
Match Trends & Patterns
-
Eagles start fast with the run, controlling clock and tempo.
-
Commanders’ success depends heavily on avoiding turnovers.
-
Balanced offense is harder to defend; defensive pressure alone is insufficient.
-
Third-down conversions and red-zone efficiency are decisive.
Expert Evaluation & What This Means for Both Teams
For the Eagles
-
Run-first balanced offense is a strong Super Bowl blueprint.
-
Offensive line and backfield chemistry give advantage against pass defenses.
-
Minimal turnovers and disciplined execution improve odds in high-pressure games.
For the Commanders
-
Need better ball security and situational execution.
-
Improving pass protection and rushing efficiency could make them more competitive.
-
Turnovers and penalties must be minimized to compete with elite offenses.
Comparison With Previous Encounters
-
Historically, Eagles vs Commanders games feature run-heavy vs balanced-offense dynamics.
-
Eagles’ dominance in this game shows trend toward strong ground game + efficient passing.
-
Commanders must adapt with more controlled drives to improve outcomes.
Common Mistakes That Cost Each Team the Game
-
Commanders: Turnovers, poor red-zone conversions, high penalties — all killed drives.
-
Eagles: Minor — over-reliance on run could backfire against stronger defensive fronts.
-
Both Teams: Special teams and field-position swings are critical in playoff games.
Standout Players & MVP Analysis
-
Eagles running back(s): significant rushing yards and consistent runs.
-
Eagles quarterback & offensive line: balanced pass/rush, protected ball, avoided turnovers.
-
Defensive contributors (Eagles): forced turnovers, maintained pressure, limited big plays.
Unexpected Performances
-
Rotational backs or receivers contributed key yardage or blocks.
-
Special teams and return yardage provided advantageous field position.
Expert Tips for Watching or Analyzing This Rivalry Match
-
Watch early rushing attempts for team strategy.
-
Track turnovers — they often swing playoff-level games.
-
Evaluate third-down and red-zone performance, not just total yards.
-
Balanced teams mixing run & pass are harder to defend.
-
Penalties and ball security are as critical as big plays.
Final Verdict
The 55–23 win by the Eagles over the Commanders was a complete, decisive performance — strong rushing, efficient passing, zero turnovers, and solid defense. Player stats confirm dominance in nearly every category. For the Commanders, the loss exposed critical flaws in ball security and offensive consistency. This match exemplifies how balanced offense, disciplined execution, and turnovers determine playoff football outcomes.
FAQs
1. What are the key player stats from the Washington Commanders vs Philadelphia Eagles match?
They include passing yards, rushing attempts, receptions, tackles, sacks, turnovers, and advanced metrics like EPA and success rate.
2. Who was the top performer for the Eagles?
A.J. Brown and Jalen Hurts were the standout contributors.
3. Who led the Commanders in offensive production?
Terry McLaurin and Brian Robinson Jr. provided the most impactful plays.
4. What were the quarterback stats for both teams?
Jalen Hurts recorded 246 yards and 2 TDs; Sam Howell logged 208 yards and one TD.
5. Which defense performed better?
The Eagles’ defense generated higher pressure and more disruptive plays.
6. What was the biggest statistical difference between the two teams?
Red-zone efficiency and explosive passing plays favored the Eagles.
7. How many sacks did each team register?
The Eagles defense recorded more pressure and sacks overall.
8. What were the rushing stats for the match?
Swift (Eagles) and Robinson Jr. (Commanders) led their teams respectively.
9. Who scored receiving touchdowns?
A.J. Brown for the Eagles and Terry McLaurin for the Commanders.
10. What is the significance of EPA/play?
EPA/play measures how much each play contributes to scoring probability.
11. What were the third-down stats?
Eagles performed better in converting key downs.
12. How does target share affect performance?
Higher target share indicates a more central role in the offense.
13. What were the defensive tackle stats?
Jonathan Allen and Haason Reddick led their respective teams.
14. Did turnovers impact the game?
Yes, turnovers shifted momentum and field position.
15. What is success rate?
Success rate measures how often a play is considered “successful” based on down-and-distance criteria.
16. Which team dominated time of possession?
The teams were relatively balanced with slight advantages based on drives.
17. How did QB pressure affect the match?
Hurts handled pressure better; Howell struggled when blitzed.
18. Who led the game in receiving yards?
A.J. Brown with 96 yards.
19. Were there any explosive plays?
Yes, multiple 20+ yard receptions and chunk runs.
20. How can these stats help fantasy football decisions?
They signal trends and usage patterns for future matchups.
21. Where can I find updated Commanders vs Eagles stats?
Official NFL, ESPN, team sites, and advanced analytics platforms.










